When a handshake goes beyond the elbow, it becomes something else.
A story is told of a westerner who for the first time set foot on the shores of Africa. The only thing he was armed with was a Bible. As he approached the indigenous folks of the land who had never set their eyes on a white before, he signaled them repeatedly in the best way he could. He made gestures of plead and surrender. They welcomed him. Subsequently, he asked them to bow their heads so they could pray. He then handed them the Bible. The way I see it, there was a swap. It was as if our ability to think for ourselves and our system of doing things had crossed over into the hands of the other party. How then as a continent can we tackle the handshake that has gone beyond the elbow?
The word “interference” from the Oxford Learner’s Dictionary is defined as the act of getting involved in and trying to influence a situation that should not really involve you in a way that annoys other people.
External interference in Africa is not a new phenomenon. External interference has taken the form of economic exploitation, military intervention and political manipulation. As far as I’m able to judge, interference happens because of our own inferiority and the supremacy views of others. History has demonstrated not once or twice that their intentions appear to be noble in the beginning but when they have come in like the trojan horse they go beyond their mandates.
Interference in Africa commenced with slavery. When slavery lost its value, it graduated into colonization. At the time of colonization and after independence many coups were conducted with the support of foreign powers and former colonial masters. A typical instance was when someone was put in a plane and brought to his country to become a president. There have been 200 coups in Africa from 1965 to 2012. The European powers in Berlin had a conference and divided the continent of Africa into spheres of influence.
The west no longer had to use force and there was no competitor. There was dominance of one set of interests. The African American John Henric Clarke once said, “We regained independence by mimicking European governance systems.” African countries cannot succeed based on European systems. Neo colonialism is alive and most dangerous. It would be no exaggeration to say that the American and European powers are at their most diabolic. They interfere diplomatically by treating our heads of state in a condescending manner; militarily; through institutions like the International Monetary Fund and World Bank; by ensuring that our economic infrastructure is beholding to theirs through dollarization; through education; influencing our processes by lending us unsolicited advice telling us what to do; through non-governmental organizations, the US Aid for the purpose of influencing our processes and infiltrating our institutions.
The shareholding of the African Development Bank comprises Americans, Germans, Japanese, French. The Europeans interfere through post-colonial institutions like the commonwealth of independent nations, former French speaking nations. Africans must recognize our internal weakness. The problem of Africa is squarely one of political leadership. Most of our leaders are thieves, individuals who are not interested in the interest of this continent. They tend to be manipulated and unfortunately the citizenry does not make demands on them.
There was a period in Africa within the span of two weeks, the American, Russian, French Chinese and Turkish ministers came around. What were they looking for? Certainly, their best interest. They engage little countries and not the East African communities or the Ecowas because they are big and not manipulable. The 14th and 15th days of 2022, the African heads of states and government were summoned to Washington DC after the President had spoken to them and given them photograph opportunity. The 54 African countries were given a sum of 60 billion dollars. Then the American President started engaging in bilateral agreements with Burundi, Lesotho, Kenya. World Trade Organization, the very first meeting of the United Nations in 1945 San Francisco. WTO was constructed in a manner that does not benefit us. The idea that Africa continues to remain a producer of primary goods, and we continue to consume value added goods.
The International Economic Architecture is one in which Africa does not participate in a meaningful way. For instance, the Bretton Woods institutions the World Bank and IMF created in 1944 in Bretton Woods in New Hampshire, British and American economists immediately after the World War II targeted the reparation of Europe through Marshall Plan. We are grafted into it and then we become beholden to them so that when you hear IMF is in your country you ought to be very worried because the prescriptions are one size fit all. The prescriptions of the IMF during the structure adjustment in 1980s, not a single country came out in proper shape.
I strongly assert that the most important weapon in the hands of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed. As far as I am concerned, if what we educate, what we communicate, our narrative, is not controlled, it develops what we see that is a disconnection between leadership and citizenry, disconnection between the young and old, analogue generation that has power and the virtual generation that is unemployed.
Until the continent assures its stomach infrastructure and mental infrastructure by the ability to feed itself and to think for itself and ideate respectively, then I suppose this continent will be fed and thought for by others. We must be mindful of foreign goods even when it is a gift because believe you me, they do not mean well. It is said that “He who pays the piper calls the tune.” My take on this is that in order to be understood and respected, we must begin to pay for our own things.
It is our responsibility to safeguard our sovereignty, define our interests and the paths to achieve those priorities. We need to strengthen our capacity to define our own policies, honor them and to implement them for the benefit of our people is crucial to limit the interferences or otherwise minimize them. We should not keep blaming others for interference because it is counterproductive.
We should in turn invest in building our own capabilities to prevent and tackle interference effectively. We should ensure that we know what we want and how we can put forward our own interest and be able to deal with the interest of others so that we can obtain successful continental integration. We must solve our own problem. We have a responsibility to ourselves both at the leadership and civil society levels.
We must engage, keep shouting, without being diplomatic because diplomacy is lulling us into a false sense of security. In 1917 at Champa ran campaign, Mahatma Gandhi told Charlie Andrews that he doesn’t want him to participate because now the Indian must believe that they can do it themselves. I could not agree more that there comes a time in the history of a nation when even friends of goodwill must be told, “keep aside”. We want to believe we can do it. Your help must be surreptitious and subterranean.
Going forward, we must be conscious. As to training, we are to go to the westerners, learn what they teach but bring it back home and customize it for the benefit of our people. Learning is universal and defies geography, but it is wisdom to use what has been learnt for our benefit. We are capable of discerning who is better and that is the responsibility of our leadership, unfortunately our leadership is not doing well at that. That is why the demands from the civil society and Academia must constantly remind leadership that when you are dining with the devil you must do so with a long spoon.
I am not professing that we should shut ourselves completely from the world, rather we must define how we engage with the world. I dare say that as individual countries we are weak but the bigger we are the better. Kwame Nkrumah’s speech on the 24th of May 1963 he said, “The only way in which we are going to ensure that we survive in this hostile world is to have one government.” I am absolutely convinced that if we want to stop foreign interference and engage constructively, we must have a large market and that market will be the East African market and in Ecowas to create the ECO currency which was torpedoed by the French.
Well, I must say it is a way of immunizing ourselves against nations of not only Europe but China, Russia, Turkey, Qatar, Emirates who are increasingly coming into our continent. But beyond the faults in the African Union, Agenda 2063, the 7 Aspirations are designed specifically to ensure we form a bull walk against this foreign interference. External interference is an intergenerational battle, and our duty is to carry the torch. If you ask me, the worst mistake we can make is to throw in the towel.
- – By fellow Esther Arthur Maclean
Reference The 10th National Security Symposium held in Kigal, 8th May 2023